The Red Velvet Lawyer

16/16 An Analysis of Qatar’s Mediation Law No. 20 of 2021, Mediator Misconduct Background I n 2006, I published a book-length article analyzing grievances filed against mediators  in five U.S. states with robust complaint systems.   See Paula M. Young, Take it or Leave it. Lump it or Grieve it: Designing Mediator Complaint Systems that Protect Mediators, Unhappy Parties, Attorneys, Courts, the Process, and the Field , 21 Ohio St. J. Disp. Resol. 721 (2006), available here .  The following background discussion is taken from that article.  I have not included the numerous citations. In the article, I noted that studies show that sixty-five to eighty-two percent of parties to family mediation viewed their mediators as “warm, sympathetic, and sensitive to feelings.” They found them “helpful in standing up for their rights in disagreements with spouses; staying focused on the important issues; and having clear and sufficient information for decisionmaking.” But, eighteen to thirty-five

15/16 An Analysis of Qatar’s Mediation Law No. 20 of 2021, the Mediator's Fees and Expenses Background Mediators can charge by the hour, the half day, the whole day, or a flat fee for the entire mediation.  Most ethics codes in the U.S. discourage a contingency fee based on the settlement value because it can compromise the mediator's impartiality towards and independence from the outcome of the mediation.  I wrote about this risk here .  In some cases, usually family law cases, the spouse with greater financial resources may agree to pay the entire fee.  In that case, the mediator must take care that he or she does not show partiality towards the fee-paying spouse.  Mediation rosters, whether court-connected or created by private third-party providers (like AAA, JAMS, and IMI), will often list the mediator's fee schedule.  In any event, the mediator and the parties will negotiate the fee.  That fee agreement typically appears in the agreement to mediate or a separate fee a

14/16 An Analysis of Qatar’s Mediation Law No. 20 of 2021, the Final Settlement Agreement A successful mediation ends with the parties signing a settlement agreement.  I have discussed the settlement agreement in earlier posts.  I discussed it in the context of party control over the process choices here , in the context of confidentiality here , and in the context of the referring court's management of the litigated case here .  I will include those discussions in this post for the ease of the reader.  Duties of the Mediator in Connection with the Settlement Agreement Drafting the agreement Article 28 states that "[t]he mediation procedures shall be terminated . . . [upon the] [s]igning [of] the settlement agreement by the parties to the dispute. . . ."   Article 24 sets out the duties of the mediator in connection with settlement agreement.  It provides: The mediator shall, in the event of reaching a settlement of the dispute, wholly or partially, through mediation proc

13/16 An Analysis of Qatar’s Mediation Law No. 20 of 2021, Referring Court's Management of the Litigated Case I now want to turn to the court's role throughout the mediation process. Court's power to refer parties to mediation The Qatar Mediation Law makes clear that courts may refer cases to mediation if the parties have executed an agreement to mediate.  Article 15 states: "In the lawsuit considered before it, the court may ask the parties to settle the dispute through mediation, within a period specified by it."  This clause suggest the court will invite the parties to enforce an existing agreement to mediate or to enter a new agreement to mediate.  Article 16 states: "The court may, during the consideration of the lawsuit, before setting a date to render a judgement therein, and at any stage of the litigation, decide, based on the agreement of the parties, to stop considering the lawsuit and refer the dispute to be settled through mediation." As I no

12/16 An Analysis of Qatar’s Mediation Law No. 20 of 2021, Confidentiality in Mediation, Part 2: Many Unanswered Questions In my last post , I set out a framework for analyzing statutes or rules governing confidentiality in mediation.  I will use it to analyze the Qatar Mediation Law.   Articles 23, 24, 30, 31, and 32 of the Qatar Mediation Law govern confidentiality in mediation. I will consider: Who is the holder of the privilege who may prevent the disclosure of confidential information? In what subsequent proceedings will confidentiality prevail? What is confidential? What is exempted from confidentiality? Who can enforce confidentiality? Against whom can confidentiality be enforced? How absolute should the grant of confidentiality be? What is the penalty for wrongful disclosure?          Who holds the privilege? Article 1 defines "Parties" as: "The parties to the dispute who have agreed to settle it by mediation, whether natural or legal persons with legal capacity

11/16 An Analysis of Qatar’s Mediation Law No. 20 of 2021, Confidentiality in Mediation, Part 1: The Analytical  Framework In an earlier post , analyzing party control over process choices, I talked about confidentiality in mediation.  I said:  This topic has  confounded many organizations trying to set guidelines for confidentiality in mediation.  In 2001, the National Conference on Uniform State Laws in the U.S. produced the  Uniform Mediation Act  after many drafting sessions occurring over several years.  A large part of the draft law applies to confidentiality.   After a lapse of 22 years, only  twelve  states have adopted it.  Instead, other states rely on their own laws governing mediator confidentiality. Similarly, various iterations of rules governing confidentiality exist all over the world.  Accordingly, to create some structure to the analysis, I am providing this discussion covering: What are the breakdowns in the process that lead to a desire to breach mediation confident